{"help": "https://datastore.landcareresearch.co.nz/sq/api/3/action/help_show?name=datastore_search", "success": true, "result": {"include_total": true, "limit": 100, "records_format": "objects", "resource_id": "b83ef4d2-69d6-4a65-9425-c4b65de820f8", "total_estimation_threshold": null, "records": [{"_id":1,"Worksheet":"Raw Data","WS_Description":"Raw data for foliage samples associated with Windley et al. 2016: Foliar nutritional quality explains patchy browsing damage caused by an invasive mammal.","Field":"Sample ID","Description":"Unique foliage sample identification number.","Type":"Numeric","Units":"number"},{"_id":2,"Worksheet":"Raw Data","WS_Description":"Raw data for foliage samples associated with Windley et al. 2016: Foliar nutritional quality explains patchy browsing damage caused by an invasive mammal.","Field":"Season","Description":"The month in which foliage samples were collected and browse assessment made: 1 = November 2010; 2 = February 2011; 3 = May 2011; 4 = November 2011.","Type":"Numeric","Units":"number"},{"_id":3,"Worksheet":"Raw Data","WS_Description":"Raw data for foliage samples associated with Windley et al. 2016: Foliar nutritional quality explains patchy browsing damage caused by an invasive mammal.","Field":"Possum Control zone (Y/N)","Description":"Was the sample within the possum control boundary (from a site at which possum control occurred)?","Type":"Text","Units":""},{"_id":4,"Worksheet":"Raw Data","WS_Description":"Raw data for foliage samples associated with Windley et al. 2016: Foliar nutritional quality explains patchy browsing damage caused by an invasive mammal.","Field":"Line","Description":"One of two transects; Line 1 = Waitewaewae, Line 2 = Totara Flats (See Fig S1).","Type":"Numeric","Units":"number"},{"_id":5,"Worksheet":"Raw Data","WS_Description":"Raw data for foliage samples associated with Windley et al. 2016: Foliar nutritional quality explains patchy browsing damage caused by an invasive mammal.","Field":"Plot","Description":"Plot within Line. The plot number corresponds with its position within a Line (See Fig S1).","Type":"Numeric","Units":"number"},{"_id":6,"Worksheet":"Raw Data","WS_Description":"Raw data for foliage samples associated with Windley et al. 2016: Foliar nutritional quality explains patchy browsing damage caused by an invasive mammal.","Field":"Tree ID","Description":"Unique tree identification number.","Type":"Numeric","Units":"number"},{"_id":7,"Worksheet":"Raw Data","WS_Description":"Raw data for foliage samples associated with Windley et al. 2016: Foliar nutritional quality explains patchy browsing damage caused by an invasive mammal.","Field":"Species","Description":"The tree species from which sample was collected: KAM = Wenmania racemosa;  TOR = Myrsine salicina; RIM = Dacrydium cupressinum; HIN = Elaeocarpus dentatus; MAH = Melicytus ramiflorus.","Type":"Text","Units":""},{"_id":8,"Worksheet":"Raw Data","WS_Description":"Raw data for foliage samples associated with Windley et al. 2016: Foliar nutritional quality explains patchy browsing damage caused by an invasive mammal.","Field":"Tree Basal Area (m2)","Description":"Tree basal area calculated from tree diameter at breast height.","Type":"Numeric","Units":"squaremetre"},{"_id":9,"Worksheet":"Raw Data","WS_Description":"Raw data for foliage samples associated with Windley et al. 2016: Foliar nutritional quality explains patchy browsing damage caused by an invasive mammal.","Field":"Possum Browse Category","Description":"A possum browse assesment based on the Foliar Browse Index (Payton et al. 1999): 0 = No browse; 1 = Light; 2 = Moderate; 3 = Heavy; x = no assesment possible.","Type":"Numeric","Units":"number"},{"_id":10,"Worksheet":"Raw Data","WS_Description":"Raw data for foliage samples associated with Windley et al. 2016: Foliar nutritional quality explains patchy browsing damage caused by an invasive mammal.","Field":"AvailN","Description":"Available Nitrogen; an in vitro measure of digestible protein.","Type":"Numeric","Units":"percent"},{"_id":11,"Worksheet":"Raw Data","WS_Description":"Raw data for foliage samples associated with Windley et al. 2016: Foliar nutritional quality explains patchy browsing damage caused by an invasive mammal.","Field":"DMD","Description":"In vitro dry matter digestibility.","Type":"Numeric","Units":"percent"},{"_id":12,"Worksheet":"Raw Data","WS_Description":"Raw data for foliage samples associated with Windley et al. 2016: Foliar nutritional quality explains patchy browsing damage caused by an invasive mammal.","Field":"Total N","Description":"Total nitrogen concentration of the sample.","Type":"Numeric","Units":"percent"},{"_id":13,"Worksheet":"Raw Data","WS_Description":"Raw data for foliage samples associated with Windley et al. 2016: Foliar nutritional quality explains patchy browsing damage caused by an invasive mammal.","Field":"Tannin effect","Description":"The percentage of nitrogen that is bound by tannin in the sample.","Type":"Numeric","Units":"percent"}], "fields": [{"id": "_id", "type": "int"}, {"id": "Worksheet", "type": "text"}, {"id": "WS_Description", "type": "text"}, {"id": "Field", "type": "text"}, {"id": "Description", "type": "text"}, {"id": "Type", "type": "text"}, {"id": "Units", "type": "text"}], "_links": {"start": "/api/3/action/datastore_search?resource_id=b83ef4d2-69d6-4a65-9425-c4b65de820f8", "next": "/api/3/action/datastore_search?resource_id=b83ef4d2-69d6-4a65-9425-c4b65de820f8&offset=100"}, "total": 13, "total_was_estimated": false}}