_id Variable Component Subcomponent Metric Subset Data type Levels 1 Index Scoping exercise Unique id Unique identifier for action "" Numeric "" 2 Category_ID Scoping exercise Action category Identifier "" Numeric "" 3 Category_header_ID Scoping exercise Action category Name "" Text "" 4 Category_header_label Scoping exercise Action category Label "" Text "" 5 Category_prioritisation_description Scoping exercise Action category Description "" Text "" 6 Overall_priority Online engagement All surveys Preliminary priority classification "" Categorical (top, medium, low) 7 Summary_rank Online engagement All surveys Display order "" Numeric "" 8 PE_Rank Online engagement Advisor survey Overall rank All advisors Numeric "" 9 PE_Industry Online engagement Advisor survey Priority by role Industry Binary (top6, NA) 10 PE_Govt Online engagement Advisor survey Priority by role Government Binary (top6, NA) 11 PE_NGO Online engagement Advisor survey Priority by role Non-government organisation Binary (top6, NA) 12 PE_Consult Online engagement Advisor survey Priority by role Consultant Binary (top6, NA) 13 FS_RankF Online engagement Farmer survey Overall rank All farmers Numeric "" 14 FS_Sector Online engagement Farmer survey Priority by sectors "" Percentage "" 15 FS_RankNF Online engagement Non-farmer survey Overall rank All non-farmers Numeric "" 16 FS_Role Online engagement Non-farmer survey Priority by roles "" Percentage "" 17 Action_ID Scoping exercise Action Identifier "" Numeric "" 18 Action_header_ID Scoping exercise Action Name "" Text "" 19 Action_header_label Scoping exercise Action Label "" Text "" 20 Action_prioritisation_description Scoping exercise Action Description "" Text "" 21 PE_pct Online engagement Advisor survey Percent of respondents All advisors Percentage "" 22 PE_rel Online engagement Advisor survey Relevance class All advisors Categorical (high, medium, low or not) 23 PE_pctI Online engagement Advisor survey Percent of respondents Industry Percentage "" 24 PE_relI Online engagement Advisor survey Relevance class Industry Categorical (high, medium, low or not) 25 PE_pctG Online engagement Advisor survey Percent of respondents Government Percentage "" 26 PE_relG Online engagement Advisor survey Relevance class Government Categorical (high, medium, low or not) 27 PE_pctN Online engagement Advisor survey Percent of respondents Non-government organisation Percentage "" 28 PE_relN Online engagement Advisor survey Relevance class Non-government organisation Categorical (high, medium, low or not) 29 PE_pctC Online engagement Advisor survey Percent of respondents Consultant Percentage "" 30 PE_relC Online engagement Advisor survey Relevance class Consultant Categorical (high, medium, low or not) 31 FS_pctF Online engagement Farmer survey Percent of respondents All farmers Percentage "" 32 FS_relF Online engagement Farmer survey Relevance class All farmers Categorical (high, medium, low or not) 33 FS_pctF.Ar Online engagement Farmer survey Percent of respondents Arable Percentage "" 34 FS_relF.Ar Online engagement Farmer survey Relevance class Arable Categorical (high, medium, low or not) 35 FS_pctF.K Online engagement Farmer survey Percent of respondents Kiwifruit Percentage "" 36 FS_relF.K Online engagement Farmer survey Relevance class Kiwifruit Categorical (high, medium, low or not) 37 FS_pctF.W Online engagement Farmer survey Percent of respondents Wine Percentage "" 38 FS_relF.W Online engagement Farmer survey Relevance class Wine Categorical (high, medium, low or not) 39 FS_pctF.Org Online engagement Farmer survey Percent of respondents Organic Percentage "" 40 FS_relF.Org Online engagement Farmer survey Relevance class Organic Categorical (high, medium, low or not) 41 FS_pctF.Deer Online engagement Farmer survey Percent of respondents Deer Percentage "" 42 FS_relF.Deer Online engagement Farmer survey Relevance class Deer Categorical (high, medium, low or not) 43 FS_pctF.Dair Online engagement Farmer survey Percent of respondents Dairy Percentage "" 44 FS_relF.Dair Online engagement Farmer survey Relevance class Dairy Categorical (high, medium, low or not) 45 FS_pctF.SB Online engagement Farmer survey Percent of respondents Sheep-beef Percentage "" 46 FS_relF.SB Online engagement Farmer survey Relevance class Sheep-beef Categorical (high, medium, low or not) 47 FS_pctF.DSB Online engagement Farmer survey Percent of respondents Dairy-sheep-beef Percentage "" 48 FS_relF.DSB Online engagement Farmer survey Relevance class Dairy-sheep-beef Categorical (high, medium, low or not) 49 FS_pctF.Oth Online engagement Farmer survey Percent of respondents Other Percentage "" 50 FS_relF.Oth Online engagement Farmer survey Relevance class Other Categorical (high, medium, low or not) 51 FS_pctNF Online engagement Non-farmer survey Percent of respondents All non-farmers Percentage "" 52 FS_relNF Online engagement Non-farmer survey Relevance class All non-farmers Categorical (high, medium, low or not) 53 FS_pctNF.I Online engagement Non-farmer survey Percent of respondents Industry Percentage "" 54 FS_relNF.I Online engagement Non-farmer survey Relevance class Industry Categorical (high, medium, low or not) 55 FS_pctNF.G Online engagement Non-farmer survey Percent of respondents Government Percentage "" 56 FS_relNF.G Online engagement Non-farmer survey Relevance class Government Categorical (high, medium, low or not) 57 FS_pctNF.N Online engagement Non-farmer survey Percent of respondents Non-government organisation Percentage "" 58 FS_relNF.N Online engagement Non-farmer survey Relevance class Non-government organisation Categorical (high, medium, low or not) 59 FS_pctNF.C Online engagement Non-farmer survey Percent of respondents Consultant Percentage "" 60 FS_relNF.C Online engagement Non-farmer survey Relevance class Consultant Categorical (high, medium, low or not) 61 FS_pctNF.R Online engagement Non-farmer survey Percent of respondents Researchers Percentage "" 62 FS_relNF.R Online engagement Non-farmer survey Relevance class Researchers Categorical (high, medium, low or not) 63 FS_pctNF.U Online engagement Non-farmer survey Percent of respondents Unspecified Percentage "" 64 FS_relNF.U Online engagement Non-farmer survey Relevance class Unspecified Categorical (high, medium, low or not) 65 prelim Priorisation workshop Priority classication Preliminary priority "" Binary (y,n) 66 final Priorisation workshop Priority classication Final priority "" Binary (y,n) 67 CFT Scoping exercise International scheme Overlap Cool Farm Tool Binary (y,NA) 68 SAFA Scoping exercise International scheme Overlap FAO's SAFA survey Binary (y,NA) 69 Maori Scoping exercise National scheme Overlap Tool for M?ori R?nanga, trusts and businesses Binary (y,NA) 70 FEP Scoping exercise National scheme Overlap Local irrigation monitoring scheme Binary (y,NA) 71 RDS Scoping exercise National scheme Overlap Rural decision makers survey Binary (y,NA) 72 total_schemes Scoping exercise All schemes Total number overlap "" Numeric ""