<data xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<row _id="1"><Worksheet>Raw Data</Worksheet><WS_Description>Raw data for foliage samples associated with Windley et al. 2016: Foliar nutritional quality explains patchy browsing damage caused by an invasive mammal.</WS_Description><Field>Sample ID</Field><Description>Unique foliage sample identification number.</Description><Type>Numeric</Type><Units>number</Units></row>
<row _id="2"><Worksheet>Raw Data</Worksheet><WS_Description>Raw data for foliage samples associated with Windley et al. 2016: Foliar nutritional quality explains patchy browsing damage caused by an invasive mammal.</WS_Description><Field>Season</Field><Description>The month in which foliage samples were collected and browse assessment made: 1 = November 2010; 2 = February 2011; 3 = May 2011; 4 = November 2011.</Description><Type>Numeric</Type><Units>number</Units></row>
<row _id="3"><Worksheet>Raw Data</Worksheet><WS_Description>Raw data for foliage samples associated with Windley et al. 2016: Foliar nutritional quality explains patchy browsing damage caused by an invasive mammal.</WS_Description><Field>Possum Control zone (Y/N)</Field><Description>Was the sample within the possum control boundary (from a site at which possum control occurred)?</Description><Type>Text</Type><Units /></row>
<row _id="4"><Worksheet>Raw Data</Worksheet><WS_Description>Raw data for foliage samples associated with Windley et al. 2016: Foliar nutritional quality explains patchy browsing damage caused by an invasive mammal.</WS_Description><Field>Line</Field><Description>One of two transects; Line 1 = Waitewaewae, Line 2 = Totara Flats (See Fig S1).</Description><Type>Numeric</Type><Units>number</Units></row>
<row _id="5"><Worksheet>Raw Data</Worksheet><WS_Description>Raw data for foliage samples associated with Windley et al. 2016: Foliar nutritional quality explains patchy browsing damage caused by an invasive mammal.</WS_Description><Field>Plot</Field><Description>Plot within Line. The plot number corresponds with its position within a Line (See Fig S1).</Description><Type>Numeric</Type><Units>number</Units></row>
<row _id="6"><Worksheet>Raw Data</Worksheet><WS_Description>Raw data for foliage samples associated with Windley et al. 2016: Foliar nutritional quality explains patchy browsing damage caused by an invasive mammal.</WS_Description><Field>Tree ID</Field><Description>Unique tree identification number.</Description><Type>Numeric</Type><Units>number</Units></row>
<row _id="7"><Worksheet>Raw Data</Worksheet><WS_Description>Raw data for foliage samples associated with Windley et al. 2016: Foliar nutritional quality explains patchy browsing damage caused by an invasive mammal.</WS_Description><Field>Species</Field><Description>The tree species from which sample was collected: KAM = Wenmania racemosa;  TOR = Myrsine salicina; RIM = Dacrydium cupressinum; HIN = Elaeocarpus dentatus; MAH = Melicytus ramiflorus.</Description><Type>Text</Type><Units /></row>
<row _id="8"><Worksheet>Raw Data</Worksheet><WS_Description>Raw data for foliage samples associated with Windley et al. 2016: Foliar nutritional quality explains patchy browsing damage caused by an invasive mammal.</WS_Description><Field>Tree Basal Area (m2)</Field><Description>Tree basal area calculated from tree diameter at breast height.</Description><Type>Numeric</Type><Units>squaremetre</Units></row>
<row _id="9"><Worksheet>Raw Data</Worksheet><WS_Description>Raw data for foliage samples associated with Windley et al. 2016: Foliar nutritional quality explains patchy browsing damage caused by an invasive mammal.</WS_Description><Field>Possum Browse Category</Field><Description>A possum browse assesment based on the Foliar Browse Index (Payton et al. 1999): 0 = No browse; 1 = Light; 2 = Moderate; 3 = Heavy; x = no assesment possible.</Description><Type>Numeric</Type><Units>number</Units></row>
<row _id="10"><Worksheet>Raw Data</Worksheet><WS_Description>Raw data for foliage samples associated with Windley et al. 2016: Foliar nutritional quality explains patchy browsing damage caused by an invasive mammal.</WS_Description><Field>AvailN</Field><Description>Available Nitrogen; an in vitro measure of digestible protein.</Description><Type>Numeric</Type><Units>percent</Units></row>
<row _id="11"><Worksheet>Raw Data</Worksheet><WS_Description>Raw data for foliage samples associated with Windley et al. 2016: Foliar nutritional quality explains patchy browsing damage caused by an invasive mammal.</WS_Description><Field>DMD</Field><Description>In vitro dry matter digestibility.</Description><Type>Numeric</Type><Units>percent</Units></row>
<row _id="12"><Worksheet>Raw Data</Worksheet><WS_Description>Raw data for foliage samples associated with Windley et al. 2016: Foliar nutritional quality explains patchy browsing damage caused by an invasive mammal.</WS_Description><Field>Total N</Field><Description>Total nitrogen concentration of the sample.</Description><Type>Numeric</Type><Units>percent</Units></row>
<row _id="13"><Worksheet>Raw Data</Worksheet><WS_Description>Raw data for foliage samples associated with Windley et al. 2016: Foliar nutritional quality explains patchy browsing damage caused by an invasive mammal.</WS_Description><Field>Tannin effect</Field><Description>The percentage of nitrogen that is bound by tannin in the sample.</Description><Type>Numeric</Type><Units>percent</Units></row>
</data>
